The course list becomes a convenient worksheet for those involved in the schedule review, approval, and update process. When section offering changes are entered into the SIS and re-imported, the Planned sections and status are reset.
When reviewing courses in your analysis term, each course includes:
- Candidate Type and the Candidate Detail: an explanation for the recommendation
Offered: sections and seats currently offered in the analyzed term.
Needed: the total number of recommended sections and seats based upon the data analyzed.
Planned: total number of sections and seats that will be offered after the scheduling changes are confirmed. This value starts out equal to Offered and can be toggled up or down to model the addition or reduction of sections.
- Status: the status of a course that can be changed relative to your schedule change process.
Your institution's admin can create Campus Groups to see course offering recommendations and registration tracking data in Align and Monitor for a logical group of campuses in addition to individual campuses.
Course Analysis and Section Details
Drill in on a single course to get the course analysis and section details to help make decisions, model your planned schedule changes, and have a conversation about the process by tagging other users.
Change a course status to Reviewed, Approved, Scheduled, or Blocked to track progress to indicate where the course is in the change lifecycle.
When changing the status of a course, a change message is generated and you are prompted to optionally select one or more other users to notify and to enter a message. Once the status change is confirmed, the messages are saved as comments in the course details.
To better understand the reason behind the Candidate Type assignments, users can hover over the Candidate Type icon to see both the Candidate Type and the Candidate Detail for a given course.
Addition Candidates (indicated by an up arrow): sections that could potentially be added to the schedule to meet student needs. Situations where the demand indicates that you could fill at least another half section based on average section size.
Reduction Candidates (indicated by a down arrow): sections that could potentially be removed from the schedule without negatively impacting student need.
No Action Candidates (indicated by a checkmark): sections that are being offered appropriately. No action is needed for these sections.
Candidate Details for Addition Candidates
Standard Addition: analysis determines the needed number of sections is greater than the number offered for the analysis term
Potential Addition: analysis determines the needed number of sections is equal to the number offered for the analysis term, but additional values, like Enrollment Ratios and section count from baseline and like terms, show evidence that additional sections may be needed
Candidate Details for Reduction Candidates
Standard Reduction: analysis determines that the needed number of sections is less than the number offered for the analysis term and the Enrollment Ratio for the baseline term is less than 95% or the course was not offered in the baseline term
Low Demand: demand is minimal for the analysis term and the historical Enrollment Ratio is less than 50%
Candidate Details for No Action Candidate
Standard No Action: analysis determines the needed number of sections is equal to the number offered for the analysis term but does not meet the addition criteria
New Course: a course is less than 365 days old within 10 days of the analysis term start date, and there are no historical equivalents
Never Been Taught on this Campus: a course or its equivalents have never been offered on that specific campus before
Overloaded No Action: offered sections exceed needed sections determined by analysis, but baseline term Enrollment Ratio is greater than or equal to 95%
Top Candidates are flagged and sorted to the top of the list by default but can be sorted by different categories. Top Candidates are those recommendations, based on meeting certain data criteria, in which the system has the most confidence and that potentially have the highest impact. Top Candidates are currently based on only historical trend analysis
Addition Top Candidate Criteria
Historical enrollment ratio is greater than or equal to 95%,
OR the highest enrollment of all the like terms is greater than the Seats Offered in the analysis term by more than 70% of the average analysis term section size for the course
Reduction Top Candidate Criteria
Historical Enrollment Ratio < 70%
AND seats offered in analysis term > Baseline Demand by at least the Average Section Size
The Align course list page can be exported to a .csv file so you can share or manipulate the data for your own needs. Look for the export icon near the top of the page. Just click this icon, confirm you want to download the file and a .csv file will be saved to your computer's default downloads location.
The Align course list export includes course identifying information:
- Sections and seats recommended by both historical analysis and Predict.
- Blended recommendation based upon your settings.
- Current and planned sections/seats.
- The campus group if applicable.
- Current review status of that course recommendation.